A simplified look at -
DNA - and the Book of Mormon
 

 
   By depending solely only on what little DNA evidence could be gleaned from the remains of America's prehistoric residents, early theories over the past century had all Native American DNA falling within four haplogroups A, B, C, and D. Three of the four haplogroups, A, C. and D are found primarily in Asia. The B haplogroup is found chiefly in southeast Asia, China, Japan, Melanesia, and Polynesia. Thus, it was determined that groups A, C, and D must have entered America from Siberia across the Bering Straits during the Ice Age when an ice bridge successfully connected North America and Asia. The people carrying the B haplogroup are thought to have arrived by boat from the South Pacific or Japan. With no new evidence to suggest otherwise, the theory that America was peopled primarily from migrating tribes from Asia was perpetuated throughout the generations until just recently when a rare genetic DNA link called haplogroup X, which is found primarily in Europe, was discovered among the North American tribes. While Native American haplogroup X is somewhat distinct from the X marker in Europe, it has proven to be distantly related, thereby setting it apart as a founding marker for certain Native Americans during the very early beginnings of its expansion and spread from the Near East. [1]
   As more study was done, it was discovered that the X haplogroup mutated as people began to migrate out from the Near East. A sub-group referred to as X1 was found primarily among those who moved into North and East Africa, while those who remained in Near East, where it ultimately weakened and disappeared through genetic drift and during the Jewish Diaspora were assigned the X2 marker. Yet, interestingly, even after the scattering of so many Jews to the four corners of the world, the Druze living in Israel and Lebanon, a monotheistic people who remained a separate and distinct population and rarely married outside their clan, retained 26% of the original X2 in their populations. While haplogroup X is found in low frequencies throughout much of the world today, 26% of a population carrying a haplogroup is rather high considering the admixture of other tribes into any given race over the years. Thus, Dan Mishmar, a genetics researcher at Ben-Gurion University, believed the Druze populations provided a rare "glimpse into the past genetic landscape of the Near East at a time when the X haplogroup was more prevalent."[2]
   After the collapse of Israel's northern and southern kingdoms, the original X founding marker ultimately spread westward across Europe where it can still be found in some places in rather high frequencies. Crossing over to America, the X haplogroup shows up in frequencies as high as 10-40% in several modern Algonquin tribes, particularly the Ojibway. It is as high as 15% among the Iroquois and Sioux. The Nuu-Chah-Nulth in the northwest carry the marker at a frequency of 11-13%, the Navajo in northeastern Arizona, southeastern Utah and northwestern New Mexico at 7%, while the Yakima of Washington carry it at frequencies of 5%. Interestingly, the remains of Washington's "Kennewick Man" exhibits evidence of the X mtDNA haplogroup.
   Once researchers discovered that the X haplogroup diminished in frequency the further west it moved from the founding tribes in the northeast, new theories began to arise for the first time which had some of the tribes arriving in America via an Atlantic crossing rather than a Pacific. Yet, when a study published in the American Journal of Human Genetics in 2001 noted that haplogroup X had been discovered among a small group of people living in the Gobi Desert in southern Siberia, researchers began to wonder if they had been premature in giving scientific credence to a possible European source for the haplogroup X found in certain Native American populations. Continuing research finally resolved the matter in 2003 when it was discovered that the X haplogroup found in Siberia was an admixture from relatively recent gene flow from Europe or West Asia.[3] But of added importance, researchers were more convinced than ever that the Near East was the geographical place of origin for the haplogroup X [4], a place which incorporates the Palestinian territories, Mesopotamia, the Caucasus, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Cyprus, and Israel—right where the Book of Mormon places the colonies of Lehi and Mulek before their migration to the promised land.
   Other interesting facts were also discovered. For instance, after analyzing dating material they discovered that two separate diffusions of the X haplogroup entered North America, one during pre-glacial times, and one after.[5] While the time-line currently in vogue among geologists is hopelessly at odds with the Biblical time-line, we can reconcile one diffusion of people carrying the X marker into America with the Jaredites who arrived from the regions north of Babylon, and the other with the Nephites who arrived from Jerusalem.
   Although several tribes across the country are known to carry the X haplogroup, it is found more frequently in the regions around the Great Lakes than elsewhere in North America. This area is dominated by the Algonquin speaking people, and the Iroquois tribes who extended from western end of the Great Lakes to Maine. Yet, interestingly, by studying the position of the X haplogroup found among Native Americans on the genetic tree, it was discovered that an early split took place at the very beginning of the expansion and spread from the Near East. It seems that one complete Native American X sequence was found among the southwestern Navajo, and the other among the tribes in Ontario who developed into the Ojibway, the two believed to have diverged, or gone their separate ways from a common point of origin after their common ancestor was already settled in America. [6] Thus, along with the four major DNA markers, A, B, C, and D, the X haplogroup is now considered a fifth founding mtDNA for Native Americans.

Defining the Possible Founding Carriers of America's X Haplogroup

   The wide distribution of the X haplogroup around the Great Lakes eastward to Maine, and from Canada and Washington State, to Arizona and the central Plains, suggests a wide initial dispersion of the founding tribes, with its origins thought by many to be linked to the Iroquois. Not only has the genetic X marker been found among the modern descendants of the Iroquois, but also in their ancient burials which were found throughout New York. As to their ties to the Book or Mormon, in 1987, Fiedel argued that the Point Peninsula people of prehistoric New York (currently thought to be the progenitors of the Iroquois) were those who spread the Algonquin speaking people into the northern Great Lakes region from their point of origin in southern Ontario—right where thousand of Point Peninsula/Nephites migrated after moving northward from western New York in the century before Christ, a fact fully established by both the archaeological record and the scriptures. After spending many years among the Ojibway in the land northward, and noting the many Hebrew traditions among them, William Warren was led to believe they were either descendants of the lost tribes of Israel, or at the very least had had a close communion with them.[7] After their own research of the matter, a number of early historians came to the same conclusions, for the evidence was simply too compelling. Today, DNA evidence supports their claims.
   The major language families around the Great Lakes include the Iroquois in the east, the Siouan in the west, and the Algonquin throughout the entire region. The movement of the Algonquin tribes into Sioux territory explains the small levels of haplogroup X in Sioux populations, for it is believed a large amount of gene flow occurred between the two people, as it did between the Sioux and Iroquois. Genes were carried further south when some of the founding tribes in southwestern New York made their way along the Allegheny River into Ohio where they became known as the Cherokee, an offshoot branch of the Iroquois. Their ties to the Ohio Hopewell civilization of 100 B.C.-350 A.D., was discovered during a treatment of the Distribution of mitochondrial DNA lineages among Native American tribes of Northeastern North America in 2001 by Malhji, Ripan, Shultz, and Smith, who concluded that the ancestors of the Cherokee were the builders of the Hopewell earth-mounds scattered throughout the Ohio Valley some 2000 years ago.[8] While a modern Cherokee carries a mixed genetic history today, the rare, pure-blooded Cherokee carries basically the X or C haplogroup through the mother's line. The X can be tied to the Near Eastern populations, while researchers suggest they picked up the C haplogroup from the more archaic populations already living in the area when they arrived.
   Other genetic markers were likely acquired from some of the newcomers they merged with, such as the Yuchi, who were likely the carriers of the R1b haplogroup found among the Cherokee. The frequency of R1b is noted most heavily in the Celtic tribes of Europe who descended from Japheth's two sons, Gomer and Magog. The R1b is thought to have originated in the Eurasian Steppes and is associated with the Kurgen mound culture and Proto-Indo-European expansion during the Bronze Age. The ever expanding and westward migrating children of Japheth into Europe from the Caucuses and Scythia may also explain how the Jewish populations in Europe and America's Cherokee populations came to have the defining Q (Y chromosome), which is currently believed to be one of their minor founding markers.

Other DNA markers linking the Eastern Tribes to the Hebrews

   Genetic ties were noted between the Jewish populations and the Cherokee when the DNA haplogroup of a Cherokee living in Virginia revealed the word Ashkenazi. Noting its importance, other Cherokee DNA files began to be pulled, only to discover they were all Ashkenazi Jews, with a few revealed to be Levites.[9] The Ashkenazi Jews in Europe were so named because the main centers of Jewish learning were located in Germany, and the Medieval Hebrew name for Germany was Ashkenazi. Even so, a 2005 study by Nebel based on Y chromosome polymorphic markers, showed that Ashkenazi Jews are more closely related to other Jewish and Middle Eastern groups than to their host populations in Europe. Although the historical record is limited, there is a consensus of cultural, linguistic, and genetic evidence that the Ashkenazi Jewish population originated in the Middle East and that the Ashkenazi Jews from Europe, the Sephardic Jews from Africa, the Cohanim, a Levite priestly class through Aaron, and the Israelites shared the same genetic signature originating in the Middle East 2000 years before the Jewish Diaspora. [10]
   The R1a (Y chromosome), which is spread through the father's line, is found in high levels Ashkenazi Jews. Behar initially believed it was restricted chiefly to the Levites among them, but further study suggests it extended well beyond the Levites to a small percent of Israelites of the non-Jewish populations as well.[11] We might remember that Lehi and Ishmael's family were among those of Joseph's line who chose to live among those of Judah and Benjamin and some of the tribe of Levi in the southern kingdom of Judah rather than with the apostates in Israel's northern kingdom. Such a move explains 2 Nephi 30:4, which states that the seed of Nephi and those that followed him into the land of promise are "descendants of the Jews." Not surprisingly, James Adair, who came to live in America before the colonies were formed and spent 33 years among the Indians documenting their customs, civil policies, history, language, religion, priests, military customs, agricultures, marriage rites and funeral ceremonies and their temperaments and manners found them all to have close affinities with the customs and traits of the Hebrews. The cultural evidence of a Hebrew presence in America is so overwhelming that notwithstanding many of the western tribes have roots with ties to Asia, it can no longer be doubted that many Native Americans have ties which link them to the Near East as well—just as the Book of Mormon claims.
   There are many things to consider in laying out the regions of the promised land the Lord planted the ancient Nephites and Jaredites, not the least of which are the numerous geographical descriptions found interspersed throughout the Book of Mormon which describe the limited territory they came to occupy. The words of the early brethren on the subject are also of importance, as are archaeological finds. Yet, while each of these subjects are still a matter of debate among various theorists, it can hardly be doubted that the genetic, linguistic and cultural traits found among the North American tribes are fully consistent with the arrival and colonization of off-shoot Hebrews into a land favored above all others, the promised land of America, the land of the free. (© Copyright, Phyllis Olive, 2009)



References:
1- Origin and Diffusion of mtDNA Haplogrup X, Reidla, Kivisild, Metsplau, Kaldman, and others.
2- Written up in the May 7th issue of the journal PLoSONE. Researchers from the Rambam Health
    Care campus, Haifa, Israel, Washington University in St. Louis Missouri, the University of Arizona in
    Tucson, Arizona. The Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot Israel also contributed to this study.
3- Origin and diffusion of mtDNA hapogroup X, 2003.
    (www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artrid=1180497.)
4- Origin and diffusion of mtDNA hapogroup X", 2003.
    (www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artrid=1180497.
5- Origin and diffusion of mtDNA hapogroup X, 2003. P. 2.
     (www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artrid=1180497.)
6- The American Journal of Human Genetics, Origin and Diffusion of mtDNA Haplogroup X.
7- William Warren, History of the Ojibway People, p. 71.
8- Distribution of mitochondrial DNA lineages among Native American tribes of Northeastern North 
     America- Human Biology, Feb. 2001 by, Ripan S. Malhi, Beth A. Schultz, David G. Smith.
9- CherokeeofLawrenceCountryTn.org.
10- Ellen Levy-Coffman, A Mosaic of People: The Jewish Story and a Reassessment of the DNA Evidence, p. 7.


For a more comprehensive study of this subject
Click Here
 

Back to Home Page